Intel Celeron G3930 vs AMD A6-5400K
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G3930 and AMD A6-5400K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G3930
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1778 vs 1268
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2237 vs 1262
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 689 vs 427
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1267 vs 641
- 23.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.874 vs 0.596
- 34.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 126.642 vs 3.665
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.88 vs 0.122
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.648 vs 1.733
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1000 vs 603
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1000 vs 603
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2017 vs October 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1778 vs 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2237 vs 1262 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 689 vs 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1267 vs 641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.874 vs 0.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.642 vs 3.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.88 vs 0.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.648 vs 1.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1000 vs 603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1000 vs 603 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-5400K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 24% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.9 vs 4.015
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2696 vs 1837
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4873 vs 3278
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2696 vs 1837
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4873 vs 3278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.9 vs 4.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2696 vs 1837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4873 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2696 vs 1837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4873 vs 3278 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G3930
CPU 2: AMD A6-5400K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G3930 | AMD A6-5400K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1778 | 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2237 | 1262 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 689 | 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1267 | 641 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1407 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.874 | 0.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.642 | 3.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.88 | 0.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.015 | 11.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.648 | 1.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1000 | 603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1837 | 2696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3278 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1000 | 603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1837 | 2696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3278 | 4873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G3930 | AMD A6-5400K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake | Trinity |
| Launch date | January 2017 | October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1704 | 1716 |
| Price now | $51.17 | |
| Processor Number | G3930 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.48 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 70 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x5902 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 610 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G3930 with others
IntelCeleron G3930 vs
AMDPhenom II X6 1075T
IntelCeleron G3930 vs
AMDPhenom II X6 1065T
IntelCeleron G3930 vs
IntelCore i3-2102
IntelCeleron G3930 vs
AMDA6-5400K
IntelCeleron G3930 vs
IntelCore i5-4590S
IntelCeleron G3930 vs
IntelCore i3-4160T
