Intel Celeron G4900 vs Intel Core i3-4160
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G4900 and Intel Core i3-4160 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G4900
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 72°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.011 vs 2.495
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.512 vs 3.033
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1013 vs 809
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1910 vs 1758
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3385 vs 2951
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1013 vs 809
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1910 vs 1758
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3385 vs 2951
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2018 vs July 2014 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 72°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 vs 2.495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 vs 3.033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 vs 809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 vs 1758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3385 vs 2951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 vs 809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 vs 1758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3385 vs 2951 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-4160
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1984 vs 1840
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3512 vs 2391
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 801 vs 746
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1714 vs 1353
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 40.003 vs 18.62
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.319 vs 0.188
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.239 vs 1.227
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1984 vs 1840 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3512 vs 2391 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 801 vs 746 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1714 vs 1353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 40.003 vs 18.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 vs 0.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.239 vs 1.227 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G4900
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4160
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1840 | 1984 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2391 | 3512 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 746 | 801 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1353 | 1714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 | 2.495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.62 | 40.003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.188 | 0.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 1.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 | 3.033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 | 809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 | 1758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3385 | 2951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 | 809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 | 1758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3385 | 2951 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Core i3-4160 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Launch date | January 2018 | July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1955 | 2130 |
| Price now | $58.80 | $139.99 |
| Processor Number | G4900 | i3-4160 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.38 | 10.64 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $133 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Die size | 177 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
| ECC memory support | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E93 | 0x41E |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 54 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2013C |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G4900 with others
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 400e
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDA8-5500
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelCore i3-4330
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4560T
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4400T
