Intel Celeron G4900 vs AMD A8-5500
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G4900 and AMD A8-5500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G4900
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 54 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1837 vs 1334
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 746 vs 455
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1353 vs 1243
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.011 vs 4.063
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.62 vs 8.685
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.188 vs 0.185
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 0.504
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.512 vs 3.038
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1013 vs 789
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1013 vs 789
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2018 vs October 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1837 vs 1334 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 746 vs 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1353 vs 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 vs 4.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.62 vs 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.188 vs 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 vs 0.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 vs 3.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 vs 789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 vs 789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2610 vs 2397
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2225 vs 1910
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4729 vs 3385
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2225 vs 1910
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4729 vs 3385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2610 vs 2397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4729 vs 3385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4729 vs 3385 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G4900
CPU 2: AMD A8-5500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G4900 | AMD A8-5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1837 | 1334 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2397 | 2610 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 746 | 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1353 | 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 | 4.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.62 | 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.188 | 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 0.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 | 3.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 | 789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 | 2225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3385 | 4729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 | 789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 | 2225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3385 | 4729 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G4900 | AMD A8-5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Trinity |
| Launch date | January 2018 | October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1963 | 1953 |
| Price now | $58.80 | |
| Processor Number | G4900 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.38 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E93 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G4900 with others
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 400e
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 B57
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4560T
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium Gold G5400
IntelCeleron G4900 vs
IntelPentium G4400T
