Intel Celeron N2830 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2830 and Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2830
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.41 GHz vs 2.26 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.616 vs 0.23
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.092 vs 0.049
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 February 2014 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.41 GHz vs 2.26 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 vs 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 vs 0.049 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 922 vs 626
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 863 vs 546
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 302 vs 201
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 517 vs 356
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.234 vs 6.627
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.446 vs 0.261
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.273 vs 0.905
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 922 vs 626 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 863 vs 546 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 vs 201 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 vs 356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.234 vs 6.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.446 vs 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.273 vs 0.905 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2830
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N2830 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 626 | 922 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 546 | 863 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 201 | 302 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 356 | 517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 | 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.627 | 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 | 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.905 | 1.273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1196 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N2830 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Penryn |
| Launch date | 23 February 2014 | 15 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $209 |
| Place in performance rating | 3198 | 3222 |
| Processor Number | N2830 | P8400 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $297.01 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.44 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.16 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.41 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| VID voltage range | 0.40V – 1.14V | 1.050V-1.150V |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 35 mm x 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||