Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Celeron N2840
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N3050 and Intel Celeron N2840 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3050
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 7.5 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.169 vs 1.114
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.435 vs 0.074
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2267 vs 1383
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2267 vs 1383
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 22 May 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 7.5 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.169 vs 1.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 vs 0.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 vs 1383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 vs 1383 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2840
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 2.58 GHz vs 2.16 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 672 vs 553
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 207 vs 186
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 370 vs 339
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6.194 vs 4.85
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.793 vs 0.25
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 0.939 vs 0.666
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz vs 2.16 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 672 vs 553 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 vs 186 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 370 vs 339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.194 vs 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.793 vs 0.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.939 vs 0.666 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3050
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2840
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron N3050 | Intel Celeron N2840 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 553 | 672 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 588 | 588 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 186 | 207 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 | 370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.169 | 1.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.85 | 6.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 | 0.074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.25 | 1.793 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.666 | 0.939 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 515 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1428 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 | 1383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 515 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1428 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 | 1383 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron N3050 | Intel Celeron N2840 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Braswell | Bay Trail |
Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 22 May 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
Place in performance rating | 2660 | 3110 |
Price now | $119.42 | |
Processor Number | N3050 | N2840 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.17 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
L1 cache | 112 KB | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.32 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
Execution Units | 12 | |
Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | 311 MHz |
Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 792 MHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 792 MHz | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 27mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | 4.5 W |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Integrated LAN | ||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 4 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
Number of USB ports | 5 | 5 |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | 1x4 |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 2 |
UART | ||
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
HD Audio | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |