Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core i7-4720HQ
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N3060 and Intel Core i7-4720HQ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3060
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.417 vs 2.293
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.107 vs 5.641
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1431 vs 539
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2267 vs 1175
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1431 vs 539
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2267 vs 1175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 1 January 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 vs 4.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 vs 2.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 vs 5.641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 vs 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 vs 1175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 vs 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 vs 1175 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4720HQ
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 45% higher clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 2.48 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1855 vs 628
- 8.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5726 vs 660
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 82.124 vs 70.313
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.576 vs 0.449
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1163 vs 498
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1163 vs 498
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 2.48 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1855 vs 628 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5726 vs 660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 82.124 vs 70.313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.576 vs 0.449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1163 vs 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1163 vs 498 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3060
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4720HQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Core i7-4720HQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 628 | 1855 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 660 | 5726 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 | 4.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.313 | 82.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 | 0.576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 | 2.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 | 5.641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 498 | 1163 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 | 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 | 1175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 498 | 1163 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 | 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 | 1175 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 791 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2765 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2981 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Core i7-4720HQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Braswell | Haswell |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 1 January 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $378 |
| Place in performance rating | 2308 | 2297 |
| Processor Number | N3060 | i7-4720HQ |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.48 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Die size | 177 mm | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | |
| Transistor count | 1400 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Device ID | 0x416 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| VGA | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.6mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1364 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 47 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron N3060 with others
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T3100
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCore i5-3340M
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCore M-5Y10
