Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Pentium N4200
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Pentium N4200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N4020
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.80 GHz vs 2.50 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1143 vs 857
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Nov 2019 vs 1 September 2016 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz vs 2.50 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1143 vs 857 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium N4200
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2164 vs 1551
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 659 vs 462
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 659 vs 462
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1844 vs 972
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1844 vs 972
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3147 vs 1769
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3147 vs 1769
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2164 vs 1551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 659 vs 462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 659 vs 462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1844 vs 972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1844 vs 972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3147 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3147 vs 1769 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N4020
CPU 2: Intel Pentium N4200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Pentium N4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1143 | 857 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1551 | 2164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 462 | 659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 462 | 659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 972 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 972 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1769 | 3147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1769 | 3147 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 317 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.711 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Pentium N4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh | Apollo Lake |
| Launch date | 4 Nov 2019 | 1 September 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $161 |
| Place in performance rating | 2232 | 2326 |
| Processor Number | N4020 | N4200 |
| Series | Intel Celeron Processor N Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $196.49 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.02 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | 0x5A84 |
| Execution Units | 12 | 18 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel® HD Graphics 505 |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | 24mm x 31mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.8 W | 4 W |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1090 | FCBGA1296 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | 6 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | 8 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron N4020 with others
IntelCeleron N4020 vs
IntelCore i7-3615QM
IntelCeleron N4020 vs
IntelCore M-5Y10a
IntelCeleron N4020 vs
IntelCeleron N4000
IntelCeleron N4020 vs
AMDE1-6015
