Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 vs AMD Sempron 3000+
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 and AMD Sempron 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 2.13 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 821 vs 530
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 774 vs 299
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | July 2006 vs May 2006 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.13 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 256 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 821 vs 530 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 774 vs 299 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3000+
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 65 Watt
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3000+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 | AMD Sempron 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 821 | 530 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 774 | 299 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 244 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 413 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 | AMD Sempron 3000+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Conroe | Manila |
| Launch date | July 2006 | May 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 2924 | 2949 |
| Price now | $19.95 | $49.95 |
| Processor Number | E6400 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.03 | 2.41 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.13 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 111 mm2 | 103 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 61.4°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.13 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 167 million | 81 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
| Sockets supported | PLGA775, LGA775 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 62 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||