Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 72.4°C
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.352 vs 0.33
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2009 vs January 2008 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 72.4°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.352 vs 0.33 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1234 vs 1208
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1210 vs 1151
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 386
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 738 vs 671
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 18.591
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.099 vs 0.081
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.68 vs 0.602
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.408 vs 2.351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1234 vs 1208 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1210 vs 1151 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 422 vs 386 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 738 vs 671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 vs 18.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.099 vs 0.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 vs 0.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.408 vs 2.351 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1208 | 1234 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 | 1210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 386 | 422 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 671 | 738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.352 | 0.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.591 | 26.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.081 | 0.099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.602 | 0.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.351 | 2.408 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2400 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | January 2009 | January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3104 | 2981 |
| Price now | $14.99 | $129.95 |
| Processor Number | E7500 | E8400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 36.85 | 4.87 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 72.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
