Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.362 vs 0.264
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.679 vs 1.59
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 vs 8 May 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.362 vs 0.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 vs 1.59 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 863 vs 837
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 828 vs 783
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 301 vs 278
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 507 vs 473
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.235 vs 0.231
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.316 vs 13.657
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.072 vs 0.066
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3072 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 863 vs 837 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 828 vs 783 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 301 vs 278 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 507 vs 473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.235 vs 0.231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.316 vs 13.657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.072 vs 0.066 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 837 | 863 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 783 | 828 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 | 301 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 | 507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 | 0.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.657 | 15.316 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 | 0.072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.362 | 0.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 | 1.59 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 | 8 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3228 | 3221 |
Price now | $39.99 | $42.99 |
Processor Number | P7450 | T7500 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.44 | 8.72 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $234 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.13 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
L2 cache | 3072 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.13 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | 1.075V - 1.250V |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |