Intel Core 2 Duo T7600G vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-70
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T7600G and AMD Athlon 64 FX-70 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7600G
- CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 125 Watt
Launch date | December 2006 vs November 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-70
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600G | AMD Athlon 64 FX-70 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Merom | Windsor |
Launch date | December 2006 | November 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 143 mm | 235 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 293 million | 227 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | M | F |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 |