Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1022 vs 970
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 988 vs 902
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 vs 321
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 601 vs 535
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.27 vs 0.259
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.086 vs 15.787
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.079 vs 0.075
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.559 vs 0.479
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.963 vs 1.875
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 3072 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1022 vs 970 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 988 vs 902 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 vs 321 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 601 vs 535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.27 vs 0.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.086 vs 15.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 vs 0.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 vs 0.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.963 vs 1.875 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 970 | 1022 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 902 | 988 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 | 352 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 | 601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 | 0.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.787 | 20.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 | 0.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 | 0.559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.875 | 1.963 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
Launch date | 10 January 2008 | 10 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | $316 |
Place in performance rating | 3206 | 3171 |
Price now | $213.99 | $57.99 |
Processor Number | T8300 | T9300 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.03 | 8.48 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
L2 cache | 3072 KB | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
VID voltage range | 1.000V-1.250V | 1.000V-1.250V |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |