Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Pentium 4 511

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Intel Pentium 4 511 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• Around 7% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
• Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 71.4°C vs 67.7°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
• 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 899

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 511

• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 76% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 781 vs 444

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4 511

Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	444 781
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1400 899

Compare specifications (specs)