Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Celeron E1400

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Intel Celeron E1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

  • CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 50% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 69% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1283 vs 758
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2479 vs 735
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 214
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 389
Specifications (specs)
Launch date August 2008 vs April 2008
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 6144 KB (per die) vs 512 KB (shared)
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1283 vs 758
PassMark - CPU mark 2479 vs 735
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 444 vs 214
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1400 vs 389

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E1400

  • Around 3% higher maximum core temperature: 73.3°C vs 71.4°C
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Maximum core temperature 73.3°C vs 71.4°C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E1400

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1283
758
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2479
735
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
444
214
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1400
389
Name Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 Intel Celeron E1400
PassMark - Single thread mark 1283 758
PassMark - CPU mark 2479 735
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 444 214
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1400 389
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 30.945
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.175
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.276

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 Intel Celeron E1400

Essentials

Architecture codename Yorkfield Conroe
Launch date August 2008 April 2008
Place in performance rating 2987 2988
Price now $54.49 $89.95
Processor Number Q9650 E1400
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 22.69 3.43
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $57

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 3.00 GHz 2.00 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB 800 MHz FSB
Die size 214 mm2 77 mm2
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 6144 KB (per die) 512 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 71.4°C 73.3°C
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 820 million 105 million
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.5V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)