Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Celeron E1400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Intel Celeron E1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1282 vs 758
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2484 vs 735
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 214
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 389
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | August 2008 vs April 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB (per die) vs 512 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1282 vs 758 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2484 vs 735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 214 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1400 vs 389 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E1400
- Around 3% higher maximum core temperature: 73.3°C vs 71.4°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C vs 71.4°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E1400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1282 | 758 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2484 | 735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 | 214 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1400 | 389 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.587 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.945 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.162 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.175 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.276 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Celeron E1400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Conroe |
| Launch date | August 2008 | April 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 2998 | 3000 |
| Price now | $54.49 | $89.95 |
| Processor Number | Q9650 | E1400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.69 | 3.43 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 214 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB (per die) | 512 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 73.3°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 820 million | 105 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.5V |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
