Intel Core M-5Y70 vs Intel Celeron 1005M
Comparative analysis of Intel Core M-5Y70 and Intel Celeron 1005M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core M-5Y70
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 37% higher clock speed: 2.60 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1081 vs 1016
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1823 vs 1109
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 509 vs 339
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 900 vs 633
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.801 vs 2.937
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.239 vs 0.149
- 10.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.004 vs 1.277
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 July 2013 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.60 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
L3 cache | 4 MB vs 2048 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1081 vs 1016 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1823 vs 1109 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 509 vs 339 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 900 vs 633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.801 vs 2.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 vs 0.149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.004 vs 1.277 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1005M
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 95°C
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.453 vs 13.109
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.522 vs 1.096
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 95°C |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 vs 13.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 vs 1.096 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core M-5Y70
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 1005M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core M-5Y70 | Intel Celeron 1005M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1081 | 1016 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1823 | 1109 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 509 | 339 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 900 | 633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.801 | 2.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.109 | 16.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | 0.149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.096 | 3.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.004 | 1.277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core M-5Y70 | Intel Celeron 1005M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Broadwell | Ivy Bridge |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 2774 | 2762 |
Processor Number | 5Y70 | 1005M |
Series | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s DMI |
Die size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 105 °C |
Maximum frequency | 2.60 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 32 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x161E | |
Graphics base frequency | 100 MHz | 650 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | 1.00 GHz |
Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | 1 GHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 16 GB | |
Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel HD Graphics |
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
CRT | ||
SDVO | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm x 1.05mm | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
Sockets supported | BGA | FCPGA988 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |