Intel Core i3-3110M vs Intel Core i3-350M
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-3110M and Intel Core i3-350M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-3110M
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1241 vs 874
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1647 vs 1083
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 440 vs 324
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 991 vs 720
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.374 vs 0.268
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.213 vs 0.1
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.686 vs 0.585
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.739 vs 1.66
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2012 vs 10 January 2010 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1241 vs 874 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1647 vs 1083 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 440 vs 324 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 991 vs 720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.374 vs 0.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 vs 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.686 vs 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.739 vs 1.66 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-350M
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.244 vs 5.372
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.244 vs 5.372 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3110M
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-350M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-3110M | Intel Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1241 | 874 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1647 | 1083 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 440 | 324 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 991 | 720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.374 | 0.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.372 | 20.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 | 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.739 | 1.66 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2703 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-3110M | Intel Core i3-350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Arrandale |
| Launch date | 1 September 2012 | 10 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | $130 |
| Place in performance rating | 2627 | 3202 |
| Price now | $139.95 | $44.05 |
| Processor Number | i3-3110M | i3-350M |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.48 | 12.65 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 118 mm | 81 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C (PGA); 105 °C (BGA) | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 382 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x166 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 667 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 667 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023) | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988, FCBGA1023 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-3110M with others
IntelCore i3-3110M vs
IntelCore 2 Extreme X9000
IntelCore i3-3110M vs
IntelCeleron M U3600
IntelCore i3-3110M vs
IntelCore i7-2760QM
IntelCore i3-3110M vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCore i3-3110M vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCore i3-3110M vs
AMDA4-9120e
