Intel Core i5-10400 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-10400 and AMD Ryzen 9 3950X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-10400
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2020 vs 25 Nov 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 10 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 6
- 20 more threads: 32 vs 12
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 4.7 GHz vs 4.30 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 5.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 5.3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2705 vs 2568
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 38749 vs 12115
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 10742 vs 4739
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 16 vs 6 |
Number of threads | 32 vs 12 |
Maximum frequency | 4.7 GHz vs 4.30 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
L1 cache | 1 MB vs 384 KB |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 64 MB vs 12 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2705 vs 2568 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 38749 vs 12115 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 10742 vs 4739 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-10400
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i5-10400 | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6744 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6744 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2568 | 2705 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 12115 | 38749 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4739 | 10742 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1296 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 14150 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i5-10400 | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Comet Lake | Zen 2 |
Launch date | 27 May 2020 | 25 Nov 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $182 | $749 |
Place in performance rating | 531 | 587 |
Processor Number | i5-10400 | |
Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors | |
Status | Launched | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
OPN PIB | 100-100000051WOF | |
OPN Tray | 100-000000051 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 1 MB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 64 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Maximum frequency | 4.30 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 16 |
Number of threads | 12 | 32 |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x9BC8 / 0x9BC5 | |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 64 GB | |
Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
4K resolution support | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C | |
Sockets supported | AM4 | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 40 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |