Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i7-975

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Core i7-975 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-13400F

• CPU is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 10 vs 4
• 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
• Around 28% higher clock speed: 4.60 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
• Around 47% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 67.9°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 45 nm
• 3.1x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 12.5x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.5x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 5.3x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 24 GB
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3639 vs 1501
• 7.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 25083 vs 3510

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-975

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core i5-13400F
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-975

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3639 1501
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	25083 3510

Compare specifications (specs)