Intel Core i5-4308U vs Intel Core i7-4870HQ
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-4308U and Intel Core i7-4870HQ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4308U
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 47 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 47 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4870HQ
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 3.70 GHz vs 3.30 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2056 vs 1828
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6332 vs 2945
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 856 vs 800
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3176 vs 1735
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.852 vs 2.3
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 82.87 vs 39.082
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.606 vs 0.262
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.077 vs 1.074
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.785 vs 2.711
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 vs 1113
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4897 vs 2184
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7403 vs 3958
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 vs 1113
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4897 vs 2184
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7403 vs 3958
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz vs 3.30 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB vs 3 MB |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2056 vs 1828 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6332 vs 2945 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 856 vs 800 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3176 vs 1735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.852 vs 2.3 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 82.87 vs 39.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.606 vs 0.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.077 vs 1.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.785 vs 2.711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 vs 1113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4897 vs 2184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7403 vs 3958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 vs 1113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4897 vs 2184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7403 vs 3958 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4308U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4870HQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4308U | Intel Core i7-4870HQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1828 | 2056 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2945 | 6332 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 800 | 856 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1735 | 3176 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.3 | 4.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 39.082 | 82.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.262 | 0.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.074 | 2.077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.711 | 5.785 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1113 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2184 | 4897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3958 | 7403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1113 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2184 | 4897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3958 | 7403 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-4308U | Intel Core i7-4870HQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Crystal Well |
| Launch date | 21 July 2014 | 21 July 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | $434 |
| Place in performance rating | 1825 | 1018 |
| Processor Number | i5-4308U | i7-4870HQ |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Die size | 181 mm | 260 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1700 Million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333, 1600; LPDDR3-1333, 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0xA2E | 0xD26 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® Iris® Graphics 5100 | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 5200 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| VGA | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3280x2000@60Hz | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.65mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1364 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 47 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-4308U with others
IntelCore i5-4308U vs
IntelPentium 3550M
IntelCore i5-4308U vs
IntelCore i5-4400E
IntelCore i5-4308U vs
IntelCore i7-4712HQ
IntelCore i5-4308U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i5-4308U vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
