Intel Core i5-430M vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-430M and Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-430M
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1212 vs 937
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 773 vs 600
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.417 vs 0.285
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.528 vs 16.672
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.115 vs 0.077
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.601 vs 0.559
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 1 April 2009 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1212 vs 937 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 773 vs 600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.417 vs 0.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.528 vs 16.672 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 vs 0.077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 vs 0.559 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1075 vs 981
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 vs 348
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.976 vs 1.759
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1075 vs 981 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 vs 348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.976 vs 1.759 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-430M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-430M | Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 981 | 1075 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1212 | 937 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 348 | 352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 773 | 600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.417 | 0.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.528 | 16.672 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 | 0.077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.759 | 1.976 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | 0.559 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-430M | Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Arrandale | Penryn |
| Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 1 April 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $241 |
| Place in performance rating | 3151 | 3167 |
| Price now | $139.95 | $56.99 |
| Processor Number | i5-430M | P8800 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.42 | 9.00 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 382 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.00V-1.25V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 500 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 766 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 766 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA1288, PGA988 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-430M with others
IntelCore i5-430M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800
IntelCore i5-430M vs
IntelCeleron N2940
IntelCore i5-430M vs
IntelAtom Z3745
