Intel Core i5-7400 vs AMD FX-8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-7400 and AMD FX-8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-7400
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 70.50°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2078 vs 1488
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5477 vs 5337
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 881 vs 518
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2786 vs 2318
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 74.155 vs 19.569
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 vs 0.427
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.201 vs 1.046
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2017 vs October 2012 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 70.50°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2078 vs 1488 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5477 vs 5337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 881 vs 518 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2786 vs 2318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.155 vs 19.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 vs 0.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.201 vs 1.046 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8300
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.50 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2697 vs 2078
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.414 vs 3.523
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.999 vs 5.905
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.50 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2697 vs 2078 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.414 vs 3.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.999 vs 5.905 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-7400
CPU 2: AMD FX-8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-7400 | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2078 | 1488 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5477 | 5337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 881 | 518 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2786 | 2318 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2078 | 2697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.523 | 9.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.155 | 19.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.201 | 1.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.905 | 5.999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5712 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5712 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-7400 | AMD FX-8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake | Vishera |
| Launch date | January 2017 | October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $202 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1394 | 2542 |
| Price now | $208.31 | $80.59 |
| Processor Number | i5-7400 | |
| Series | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.39 | 28.21 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | FD8300WMHKBOX | |
| OPN Tray | FD8300WMW8KHK | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 70.50°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.50 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Die size | 315 mm | |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x5912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | AM3+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | n / a |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-7400 with others
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
IntelCore i3-2100T
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
IntelCore i3-4360T
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
AMDA10-7870K
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
IntelCore i7-6700
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
AMDA6-9500E
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
AMDRyzen 3 2300X
