Intel Core i5-9400 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-9400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 68°C
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1075 vs 1059
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | October 2018 vs 31 August 2018 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 68°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1075 vs 1059 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 10 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 6
- 26 more threads: 32 vs 6
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 4.10 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 5.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.6x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2458 vs 2435
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 29456 vs 9373
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 12581 vs 4645
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 7974 vs 3760
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 16 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 32 vs 6 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.4 GHz vs 4.10 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB vs 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB vs 9 MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2458 vs 2435 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 29456 vs 9373 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 12581 vs 4645 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7974 vs 3760 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-9400
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-9400 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2435 | 2458 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9373 | 29456 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1075 | 1059 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4645 | 12581 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3760 | 7974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1738 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3574 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6414 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1738 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3574 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-9400 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Zen+ |
| Launch date | October 2018 | 31 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 833 | 838 |
| Processor Number | i5-9400 | |
| Series | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| OPN PIB | YD295XA8AFWOF | |
| OPN Tray | YD295XA8UGAAF | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Price now | $899.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.50 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 9 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 68°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 16 |
| Number of threads | 6 | 32 |
| Die size | 213 mm | |
| Transistor count | 9600 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0X3E98/x92 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | sTR4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | Not included |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-9400 with others
IntelCore i5-9400 vs
IntelCore 2 Extreme QX9770
IntelCore i5-9400 vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1920
IntelCore i5-9400 vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 2950X
IntelCore i5-9400 vs
IntelCore i5-5575R
IntelCore i5-9400 vs
IntelCore i3-9350K
IntelCore i5-9400 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V2546
