Intel Core i7-6900K vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-6900K and Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-6900K
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.70 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2321 vs 1794
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1005 vs 660
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7893 vs 6091
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.395 vs 9.188
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 179.127 vs 68.859
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.3 vs 1.033
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2016 vs September 2013 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz vs 3.60 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2321 vs 1794 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1005 vs 660 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7893 vs 6091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.395 vs 9.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 179.127 vs 68.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.3 vs 1.033 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 10 vs 8
- 4 more threads: 20 vs 16
- 2.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 6x more maximum memory size: 768 GB vs 128 GB
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 21270 vs 14431
- Around 67% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 14639 vs 8778
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.075 vs 5.194
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.09 vs 13.602
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 10 vs 8 |
| Number of threads | 20 vs 16 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 25600 KB (shared) vs 20480 KB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB vs 128 GB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 21270 vs 14431 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 14639 vs 8778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.075 vs 5.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.09 vs 13.602 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-6900K
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-6900K | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2321 | 1794 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 14431 | 21270 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1005 | 660 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7893 | 6091 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 8778 | 14639 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.395 | 9.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 179.127 | 68.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.3 | 1.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.194 | 6.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.602 | 18.09 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-6900K | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Broadwell E | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Launch date | May 2016 | September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,020 | $1,260 |
| Place in performance rating | 1325 | 1420 |
| Price now | $1,198.99 | $401.11 |
| Processor Number | i7-6900K | E5-2680V2 |
| Series | Intel® Core™ X-series Processors | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v2 Family |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.35 | 11.60 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) | 25600 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 10 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 20 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s QPI | |
| Die size | 160 mm | |
| Maximum core temperature | 82°C | |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.65–1.30V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 768 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 2400/2133 | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Processor graphics | None | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Package Size | 52.5mm x 45mm | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | 40 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 2S Only |
| PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 46-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
