Intel Core i9-14900HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-14900HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-14900HX
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 16
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 5.8 GHz vs 5.4 GHz
- Around 88% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3145728x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 294912x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4294 vs 4083
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 27 Jul 2023 |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 16 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.8 GHz vs 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) vs 128MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4294 vs 4083 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 57570 vs 45430
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 57570 vs 45430 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-14900HX
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i9-14900HX | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4294 | 4083 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 45430 | 57570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i9-14900HX | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 27 Jul 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 73 | 62 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Die size | 257 mm² | 2x 71 mm² |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 128MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72°C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 5.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 16 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 32 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Transistor count | 17,840 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5-5200 MHz, Dual-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | Intel BGA 1964 | FL1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 16 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) |