Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-14900K
- 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 12
- 8 more threads: 32 vs 24
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95 °C
- 2.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4740 vs 4150
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 60207 vs 48842
- Around 49% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 16598 vs 11106
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 24 vs 12 |
Number of threads | 32 vs 24 |
Maximum frequency | 6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 95 °C |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) vs 768 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 4740 vs 4150 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 60207 vs 48842 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 16598 vs 11106 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- 262144x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 1864135.1x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
L2 cache | 12 MB vs 2MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 64 MB vs 36MB (shared) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-14900K
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 9 7900
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i9-14900K | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 4740 | 4150 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 60207 | 48842 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 16598 | 11106 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 97.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.623 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i9-14900K | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Place in performance rating | 24 | 17 |
Architecture codename | Zen 4 | |
Launch date | 14 Jan 2023 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
OPN Tray | 100-000000590 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Die size | 257 mm² | 71 mm² |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 768 KB |
L2 cache | 2MB (per core) | 12 MB |
L3 cache | 36MB (shared) | 64 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 95 °C |
Maximum frequency | 6 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 24 | 12 |
Number of threads | 32 | 24 |
Unlocked | ||
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | |
Transistor count | 13140 million | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5, Dual-channel | DDR5-5200 |
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 1700 | AM5 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 20 Lanes, (CPU only) | |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 24 | |
PCI Express revision | 5.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |