Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Core i5-6200U
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-8950HK and Intel Core i5-6200U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-8950HK
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- 8 more threads: 12 vs 4
- Around 71% higher clock speed: 4.80 GHz vs 2.80 GHz
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2444 vs 1553
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 10563 vs 2995
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1117 vs 596
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5166 vs 1415
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 65.701 vs 19.309
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.914 vs 0.28
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.409 vs 2.306
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.455 vs 7.135
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1687 vs 1324
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1687 vs 1324
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2018 vs 1 September 2015 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 12 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.80 GHz vs 2.80 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB vs 512 KB |
L3 cache | 12 MB vs 3 MB |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2444 vs 1553 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 10563 vs 2995 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1117 vs 596 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5166 vs 1415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 65.701 vs 19.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.914 vs 0.28 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.409 vs 2.306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.455 vs 7.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1687 vs 1324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1687 vs 1324 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-6200U
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 812
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4174 vs 1678
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 812
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4174 vs 1678
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 vs 812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4174 vs 1678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 vs 812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4174 vs 1678 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-8950HK
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6200U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i9-8950HK | Intel Core i5-6200U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2444 | 1553 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 10563 | 2995 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1117 | 596 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5166 | 1415 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5686 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.809 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 65.701 | 19.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.914 | 0.28 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.409 | 2.306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.455 | 7.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1687 | 1324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 812 | 2479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1678 | 4174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1687 | 1324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 812 | 2479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1678 | 4174 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i9-8950HK | Intel Core i5-6200U | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
Launch date | 3 March 2018 | 1 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $583 | $281 |
Place in performance rating | 1736 | 1727 |
Price now | $583 | |
Processor Number | i9-8950HK | i5-6200U |
Series | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.32 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI | 4 GT/s OPI |
Die size | 149 mm | 99 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 3 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.80 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 2 |
Number of threads | 12 | 4 |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x3E9B | 0x1916 |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.00 GHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 64 GB | 32 GB |
Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 520 |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
4K resolution support | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 42mm x 28mm | 42mm X 24mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1356 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Configurable TDP-down | 7.5 W | |
Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 12 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Speed Shift technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |