Intel Core i9-9900K vs Intel Core i7-6700K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-9900K and Intel Core i7-6700K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-9900K
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 5.00 GHz vs 4.20 GHz
- Around 56% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 64°C
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2922 vs 2504
- 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 18182 vs 8939
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1336 vs 1148
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 8781 vs 4458
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 7011 vs 3231
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.968 vs 6.186
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 202.925 vs 101.6
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.504 vs 0.743
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.779 vs 2.939
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.406 vs 7.351
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2165 vs 1760
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4003 vs 3294
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6679 vs 3360
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2165 vs 1760
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4003 vs 3294
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6679 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2018 vs 5 August 2015 |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 16 vs 8 |
Maximum frequency | 5.00 GHz vs 4.20 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 64°C |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) vs 1 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) vs 8 MB |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 64 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2922 vs 2504 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 18182 vs 8939 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1336 vs 1148 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 8781 vs 4458 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7011 vs 3231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.968 vs 6.186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.925 vs 101.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.504 vs 0.743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.779 vs 2.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.406 vs 7.351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2165 vs 1760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4003 vs 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6679 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2165 vs 1760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4003 vs 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6679 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-6700K
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 91 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 91 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-9900K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-6700K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i9-9900K | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2922 | 2504 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 18182 | 8939 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1336 | 1148 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 8781 | 4458 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7011 | 3231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.968 | 6.186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.925 | 101.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.504 | 0.743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.779 | 2.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.406 | 7.351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2165 | 1760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4003 | 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6679 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2165 | 1760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4003 | 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6679 | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i9-9900K | Intel Core i7-6700K | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
Launch date | October 2018 | 5 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 792 | 1343 |
Price now | $909 | $316.99 |
Processor Number | i9-9900K | i7-6700K |
Series | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.63 | 10.33 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $339 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 64°C |
Maximum frequency | 5.00 GHz | 4.20 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 16 | 8 |
Unlocked | ||
Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x3E98 | 0x1912 |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
4K resolution support | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 91 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | PCG 2015D (130W) |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |