Intel N200 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Comparative analysis of Intel N200 and AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel N200
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.70 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1898 vs 1779
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5106 vs 3365
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 25 Feb 2020 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
L3 cache | 6 MB vs 4 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1898 vs 1779 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5106 vs 3365 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel N200
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel N200 | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1898 | 1779 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5106 | 3365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel N200 | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N | Zen |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 25 Feb 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | |
Place in performance rating | 1323 | 1461 |
Processor Number | N200 | |
Series | Intel Processor N-series | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Base frequency | 2.6 GHz | |
Die size | 209.8 mm² | |
L1 cache | 192 KB | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | |
Transistor count | 4950 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
Supported memory frequency | 4800 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 3200 MT/s, DDR5 4800 MT/s, LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-2400 |
ECC memory support | ||
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x46D0 | |
Execution Units | 32 | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
4K resolution support | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 35mm x 24mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1264 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Configurable TDP-down | 12 Watt | |
Configurable TDP-up | 25 Watt | |
Socket Count | FP5 | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 9 | 8 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Speed Shift technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |