Intel Pentium 2020M vs Intel Pentium B960
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium 2020M and Intel Pentium B960 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 2020M
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 90 °C vs 85C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1274 vs 975
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1396 vs 1002
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 426 vs 369
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 796 vs 657
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 70.755 vs 15.934
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.372 vs 0.151
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.787 vs 0.723
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.032 vs 1.349
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 1 October 2011 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C vs 85C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1274 vs 975 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1396 vs 1002 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 426 vs 369 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 796 vs 657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 vs 15.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 vs 0.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 vs 0.723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 vs 1.349 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium B960
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.309 vs 2.116
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.309 vs 2.116 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 2020M
CPU 2: Intel Pentium B960
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium 2020M | Intel Pentium B960 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1274 | 975 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1396 | 1002 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 426 | 369 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 796 | 657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.116 | 3.309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 | 15.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 | 0.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 | 0.723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 | 1.349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2189 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2189 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium 2020M | Intel Pentium B960 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 1 October 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | $49 |
| Place in performance rating | 2480 | 3109 |
| Price now | $134 | $48.99 |
| Processor Number | 2020M | B960 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.01 | 11.12 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 118 mm | 149 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 85C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 624 Million |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | PGA988, FCPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium 2020M with others
IntelPentium 2020M vs
IntelCore i7-2637M
IntelPentium 2020M vs
IntelCore i7-3687U
IntelPentium 2020M vs
IntelCeleron 1019Y
IntelPentium 2020M vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelPentium 2020M vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelPentium 2020M vs
AMDA4-9120e
