Intel Core i7-3687U vs Intel Pentium 2020M
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-3687U and Intel Pentium 2020M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-3687U
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 38% higher clock speed: 3.30 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 90 °C
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1598 vs 1268
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2645 vs 1379
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 571 vs 426
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1207 vs 796
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.2 vs 2.116
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2517 vs 2189
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2517 vs 2189
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 January 2013 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 90 °C |
| L3 cache | 4 MB vs 2048 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1598 vs 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2645 vs 1379 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 571 vs 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1207 vs 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.2 vs 2.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 vs 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 vs 2189 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 2020M
- 18.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 70.755 vs 3.896
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.372 vs 0.194
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.787 vs 0.967
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.032 vs 1.42
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 vs 3.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 vs 0.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 vs 0.967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 vs 1.42 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-3687U
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 2020M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-3687U | Intel Pentium 2020M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1598 | 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2645 | 1379 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 571 | 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1207 | 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.2 | 2.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3.896 | 70.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.194 | 0.372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.967 | 3.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.42 | 4.032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 2189 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-3687U | Intel Pentium 2020M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 January 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 2483 | 2471 |
| Processor Number | i7-3687U | 2020M |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | |
| Price now | $134 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.01 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 118 mm | 118 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x166 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31.0 x 24.0mm (BGA1023) | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | FCPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i7-3687U with others
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
IntelCore i7-840QM
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
IntelCore i7-2860QM
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
IntelCore i7-2637M
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
AMDA4-9120e
