Intel Pentium 4 HT 570 vs AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium 4 HT 570 and AMD Athlon 64 3700+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 HT 570
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
| Launch date | June 2004 vs May 2004 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3700+
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 115 Watt
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 16 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 4 HT 570
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3700+
| Name | Intel Pentium 4 HT 570 | AMD Athlon 64 3700+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 435 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 394 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1018 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium 4 HT 570 | AMD Athlon 64 3700+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Prescott | San Diego |
| Launch date | June 2004 | May 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 2666 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Price now | $69 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.56 | |
Performance |
||
| Die size | 109 mm | 115 mm |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 125 million | 105 million |
| 64 bit support | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 775 | 939 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 89 Watt |