Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Intel Core Duo T2050
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Intel Core Duo T2050 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 713 vs 498
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 630 vs 333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2008 vs May 2005 |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 713 vs 498 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 630 vs 333 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo T2050
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 35 Watt
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
CPU 2: Intel Core Duo T2050
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Intel Core Duo T2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 713 | 498 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 630 | 333 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 235 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 408 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 | Intel Core Duo T2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Merom | Yonah |
Launch date | 1 October 2008 | May 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 3010 | 3014 |
Processor Number | T3200 | T2050 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | 533 MHz FSB |
Die size | 143 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 667 MHz | 533 MHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 291 million | 151 million |
VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.175V | 0.7625-1.3V |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Sockets supported | PPGA478 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 |