Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 vs Intel Core Duo T2300
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Intel Core Duo T2300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher clock speed: 2.16 GHz vs 1.66 GHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 732 vs 509
- 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 653 vs 325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2008 vs January 2006 |
Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz vs 1.66 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 732 vs 509 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 653 vs 325 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo T2300
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 35 Watt
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
CPU 2: Intel Core Duo T2300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 | Intel Core Duo T2300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 732 | 509 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 653 | 325 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 251 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 447 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 | Intel Core Duo T2300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Merom | Yonah |
Launch date | 1 October 2008 | January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 2985 | 2994 |
Processor Number | T3400 | T2300 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.16 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
Die size | 143 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 667 MHz | 667 MHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 291 million | 151 million |
VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.175V | 1.1625V - 1.30V |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Sockets supported | PPGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 |