Intel Pentium G620 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G620 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G620
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1176 vs 1106
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1217 vs 1041
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 458 vs 377
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 832 vs 646
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.11 vs 0.307
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.661 vs 19.088
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.174 vs 0.081
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.831 vs 0.639
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2011 vs October 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1176 vs 1106 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1217 vs 1041 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 458 vs 377 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 832 vs 646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.11 vs 0.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.661 vs 19.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.174 vs 0.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.831 vs 0.639 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Around 7% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 69.1°C
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.262 vs 1.599
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 69.1°C |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.262 vs 1.599 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G620
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium G620 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1176 | 1106 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1217 | 1041 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 458 | 377 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 832 | 646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.11 | 0.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.661 | 19.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.599 | 2.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.174 | 0.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.831 | 0.639 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G620 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | May 2011 | October 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3014 | 3128 |
| Price now | $24.99 | $28.99 |
| Processor Number | G620 | E7400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.01 | 18.04 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 131 mm | 82 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 3072 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 69.1°C | 74.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 504 million | 228 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium G620 with others
IntelPentium G620 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6300
IntelPentium G620 vs
AMDAthlon 64 LE-1640
IntelPentium G620 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8400
IntelPentium G620 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 435
IntelPentium G620 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelPentium G620 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550
