Intel Pentium N3700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium N3700 and Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium N3700
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.40 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 45 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1255 vs 729
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 457
- 12.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.632 vs 0.217
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.127 vs 0.065
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.51 vs 0.421
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.706 vs 1.576
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1255 vs 729 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 vs 457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.632 vs 0.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.127 vs 0.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.51 vs 0.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.706 vs 1.576 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 781 vs 633
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 270 vs 212
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.882 vs 11.663
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 781 vs 633 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 270 vs 212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.882 vs 11.663 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium N3700
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 633 | 781 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1255 | 729 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 212 | 270 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.632 | 0.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.663 | 13.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.127 | 0.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.51 | 0.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.706 | 1.576 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 569 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1298 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 569 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1298 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Braswell | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 15 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2714 | 3257 |
| Price now | $444.78 | $19.99 |
| Processor Number | N3700 | P7350 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.22 | 19.03 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
| VID voltage range | 1.062V-1.150V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 16 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | Yes | |
| OpenGL | Yes | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium N3700 with others
IntelPentium N3700 vs
IntelCore i7-2720QM
IntelPentium N3700 vs
IntelCore i3-3217U
IntelPentium N3700 vs
IntelCore m3-7Y32
