Intel Xeon 2.8 vs AMD Opteron X2 180

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon 2.8 and AMD Opteron X2 180 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 2.8

  • CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Launch date October 2005 vs September 2005
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 180

  • 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 135 Watt
L1 cache 128 KB vs 16 KB
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 vs 1
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 135 Watt

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Xeon 2.8 AMD Opteron X2 180

Essentials

Architecture codename Paxville Denmark
Launch date October 2005 September 2005
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 213 mm
L1 cache 16 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Transistor count 200 million 233 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 2
Sockets supported 604 939
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 135 Watt 110 Watt

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Xeon 2.8 with others

Intel Xeon 2.8 Intel
Xeon 2.8
vs AMD Opteron X2 865 AMD
Opteron X2 865
Intel Xeon 2.8 Intel
Xeon 2.8
vs AMD Opteron X2 280 AMD
Opteron X2 280
Intel Xeon 2.8 Intel
Xeon 2.8
vs AMD Opteron X2 180 AMD
Opteron X2 180