Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Intel Xeon X5675
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E3-1270 and Intel Xeon X5675 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E3-1270
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 3.80 GHz vs 3.46 GHz
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1746 vs 1513
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 738 vs 588
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.187 vs 2.995
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 79.092 vs 58.16
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.794 vs 14.068
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | April 2011 vs February 2011 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz vs 3.46 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1746 vs 1513 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 738 vs 588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.187 vs 2.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.092 vs 58.16 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.794 vs 14.068 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X5675
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
- Around 18% higher maximum core temperature: 81.3°C vs 69.1°C
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 9x more maximum memory size: 288 GB vs 32 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 11736 vs 5352
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3454 vs 2830
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.923 vs 0.558
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.77 vs 3.622
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 vs 8 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81.3°C vs 69.1°C |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) vs 8192 KB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB vs 32 GB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 11736 vs 5352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3454 vs 2830 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.923 vs 0.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.77 vs 3.622 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E3-1270
CPU 2: Intel Xeon X5675
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Intel Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1746 | 1513 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5352 | 11736 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 738 | 588 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2830 | 3454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.187 | 2.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.092 | 58.16 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.558 | 0.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.622 | 3.77 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.794 | 14.068 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4712 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Intel Xeon X5675 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Westmere EP |
| Launch date | April 2011 | February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $369 | $162 |
| Place in performance rating | 2110 | 2111 |
| Price now | $317 | $79.99 |
| Processor Number | E3-1270 | X5675 |
| Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 Family | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | 30.70 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.40 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 6.4 GT/s QPI |
| Die size | 216 mm | 239 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 12288 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 69.1°C | 81.3°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
| Transistor count | 1160 million | 1170 million |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| VID voltage range | 0.750V-1.350V | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 288 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 800/1066/1333 |
Graphics |
||
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 42.5mm X 45mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA1155 | FCLGA1366 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 20 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 40-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon E3-1270 with others
IntelXeon E3-1270 vs
IntelXeon X5675
IntelXeon E3-1270 vs
IntelXeon E3-1260L
IntelXeon E3-1270 vs
IntelXeon E3-1225 v2
IntelXeon E3-1270 vs
AMDOpteron 6284 SE
IntelXeon E3-1270 vs
AMDOpteron X2170
IntelXeon E3-1270 vs
AMDOpteron 1389
