Intel Xeon Gold 6416H vs AMD EPYC 4484PX

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Gold 6416H and AMD EPYC 4484PX processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Gold 6416H

• 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 18 vs 12
• 12 more threads: 36 vs 24
• Around 88% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 70451 vs 51115

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4484PX

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 5.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
• 2.8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 165 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4251 vs 3476

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 4484PX

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3476 4251
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	70451 51115

Compare specifications (specs)