Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y vs AMD EPYC 7352

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y and AMD EPYC 7352 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 36 vs 24
• 24 more threads: 72 vs 48
• Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2489 vs 2040

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7352

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm, 14 nm vs 10 nm
• 2.4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 155 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 65921 vs 54078

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 7352

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2489 2040
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	54078 65921

Compare specifications (specs)