Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs AMD FX-6100

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 and AMD FX-6100 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8368

• CPU is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 32 more cores, run more applications at once: 38 vs 6
• 70 more threads: 76 vs 6
• Around 20% higher maximum core temperature: 84°C vs 70°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 8.4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 6.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 7.1x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2345 vs 1318
• 23.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 88038 vs 3695

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6100

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 270 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
CPU 2: AMD FX-6100

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2345 1318
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	88038 3695

Compare specifications (specs)