Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H vs Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H and Intel Xeon Gold 5412U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 32 vs 24
- 16 more threads: 64 vs 48
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 83% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 62347 vs 52218
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 32 vs 24 |
| Number of threads | 64 vs 48 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 82.5 MB vs 45 MB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 62347 vs 52218 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 270 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3074 vs 2831
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 270 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3074 vs 2831 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H
CPU 2: Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | Intel Xeon Gold 5412U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2831 | 3074 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 62347 | 52218 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H | Intel Xeon Gold 5412U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 10 Jan 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6540 | $1113 |
| Place in performance rating | 224 | 226 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm² | |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 82.5 MB | 45 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71°C | 81°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 32 | 24 |
| Number of threads | 64 | 48 |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | 4677 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 270 Watt | 185 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) |
