Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 vs AMD EPYC 9354
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 and AMD EPYC 9354 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8470
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 20 more cores, run more applications at once: 52 vs 32
- 40 more threads: 104 vs 64
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3407872x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 430080x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3153 vs 2835
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
Number of cores | 52 vs 32 |
Number of threads | 104 vs 64 |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 105 MB vs 256MB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3153 vs 2835 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9354
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 280 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 110973 vs 89850
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 110973 vs 89850 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8470
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9354
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 | AMD EPYC 9354 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3153 | 2835 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 89850 | 110973 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 | AMD EPYC 9354 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 10 Nov 2022 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9359 | $3420 |
Place in performance rating | 36 | 22 |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 2000 MHz | 3.25 GHz |
Die size | 4x 477 mm² | 8x 72 mm² |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 105 MB | 256MB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 52 | 32 |
Number of threads | 104 | 64 |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
Max memory channels | 12 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Sockets supported | 4677 | SP5 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 280 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | 5.0 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 128 |