Intel Xeon W-3235 vs Intel Core i9-9900K
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W-3235 and Intel Core i9-9900K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W-3235
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 8
- 8 more threads: 24 vs 16
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 20% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 TB vs 128 GB
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 25723 vs 18322
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 11988 vs 8781
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2019 vs October 2018 |
| Number of cores | 12 vs 8 |
| Number of threads | 24 vs 16 |
| L1 cache | 768 KB vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB vs 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB vs 16 MB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB vs 128 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 25723 vs 18322 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 11988 vs 8781 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-9900K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 14% higher clock speed: 5.00 GHz vs 4.40 GHz
- Around 39% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 72°C
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2932 vs 2642
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1336 vs 1088
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 5.00 GHz vs 4.40 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 72°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2932 vs 2642 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1336 vs 1088 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU 2: Intel Core i9-9900K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon W-3235 | Intel Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2642 | 2932 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 25723 | 18322 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1088 | 1336 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 11988 | 8781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.968 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.779 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.406 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2165 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4003 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2165 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4003 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon W-3235 | Intel Core i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Launch date | 3 June 2019 | October 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1398 | |
| Place in performance rating | 739 | 743 |
| Processor Number | W-3235 | i9-9900K |
| Series | Intel Xeon W Processor | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $909 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.63 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.40 GHz | 5.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 12 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 24 | 16 |
| Number of Ultra Path Interconnect (UPI) Links | 0 | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 131.13 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Compatibility |
||
| Package Size | 76.0mm x 56.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 64 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Run Sure Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Number of AVX-512 FMA Units | 2 | |
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E98 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon W-3235 with others
IntelXeon W-3235 vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1920
IntelXeon W-3235 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U
IntelXeon W-3235 vs
IntelXeon E5-2650 v4
IntelXeon W-3235 vs
IntelCore i5-6500TE
IntelXeon W-3235 vs
IntelXeon E-2244G
IntelXeon W-3235 vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 4750U
