Intel Xeon W-3275 vs Intel Core i5-10400
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W-3275 and Intel Core i5-10400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W-3275
- 22 more cores, run more applications at once: 28 vs 6
- 44 more threads: 56 vs 12
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 4.40 GHz vs 4.30 GHz
- 3.2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 TB vs 128 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2606 vs 2565
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 41469 vs 12057
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 28 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 56 vs 12 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.40 GHz vs 4.30 GHz |
| L3 cache | 38.5 MB vs 12 MB |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB vs 128 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2606 vs 2565 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 41469 vs 12057 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-10400
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 76°C
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 205 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2020 vs 3 Jun 2019 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 76°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon W-3275
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-10400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon W-3275 | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2606 | 2565 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 41469 | 12057 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4164 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4164 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6744 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6744 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4726 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Intel Core i5-10400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake | Comet Lake |
| Launch date | 3 Jun 2019 | 27 May 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4894 | $182 |
| Place in performance rating | 503 | 504 |
| Processor Number | W-3275 | i5-10400 |
| Series | Intel Xeon W Processor | 10th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors |
| Vertical segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L3 cache | 38.5 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 76°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.40 GHz | 4.30 GHz |
| Number of cores | 28 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 56 | 12 |
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 384 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Compatibility |
||
| Package Size | 76.0mm x 56.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA3647 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 64 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Run Sure Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel AVX-512 | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Number of AVX-512 FMA Units | 2 | |
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x9BC8 / 0x9BC5 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
