Intel Xeon W-3375 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W-3375
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 34 more cores, run more applications at once: 38 vs 4
- 68 more threads: 76 vs 8
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 4.00 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm vs 14 nm FinFET
- 6.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 19x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 14.3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2636 vs 2155
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 59091 vs 8539
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Jul 2021 vs 10 May 2018 |
Number of cores | 38 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 76 vs 8 |
Maximum frequency | 4.00 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm FinFET |
L1 cache | 2432 KB vs 384 KB |
L2 cache | 38 MB vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 57 MB vs 4 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2636 vs 2155 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 59091 vs 8539 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 19% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 80°C
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 270 Watt
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 80°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 270 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon W-3375
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon W-3375 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2636 | 2155 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 59091 | 8539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1994 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1994 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon W-3375 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ice Lake | Raven Ridge |
Launch date | 29 Jul 2021 | 10 May 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4951 | |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 269 |
Processor Number | W-3375 | |
Series | Intel Xeon W Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Vertical segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | |
OPN Tray | YD240BC5M4MFB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 2.50 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | |
L1 cache | 2432 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 38 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 57 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm FinFET |
Maximum core temperature | 80°C | 95°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.00 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 38 | 4 |
Number of threads | 76 | 8 |
64 bit support | ||
Compute Cores | 15 | |
Die size | 210 mm | |
Number of GPU cores | 11 | |
Transistor count | 4950 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 8 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | |
Supported memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2933 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
Package Size | 77.5mm x 56.5mm | |
Sockets supported | FCLGA4189 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 270 Watt | 65 Watt |
Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 64 | |
PCI Express revision | 4 | 3.0 |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel AVX-512 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
Number of AVX-512 FMA Units | 2 | |
Speed Shift technology | ||
AMD SenseMI | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 1250 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 11 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 11 Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI |