Intel Xeon W3503 vs AMD Opteron 146
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W3503 and AMD Opteron 146 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3503
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1025 vs 400
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1118 vs 346
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | March 2009 vs September 2003 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 130 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1025 vs 400 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1118 vs 346 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 146
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 130 Watt
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon W3503
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 146
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon W3503 | AMD Opteron 146 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1025 | 400 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1118 | 346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.27 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.098 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon W3503 | AMD Opteron 146 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield | SledgeHammer |
| Launch date | March 2009 | September 2003 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $60 |
| Place in performance rating | 3152 | 3161 |
| Price now | $16.22 | $59.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 31.88 | 2.62 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 263 mm | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 731 million | 106 million |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 1366 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 89 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||