AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) vs AMD Radeon HD 6290
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) and AMD Radeon HD 6290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.8x more boost clock speed: 1900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2923.1x more texture fill rate: 15.20 GTexel/s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 128 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 22.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5019 vs 220
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 4 December 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 80 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5019 vs 220 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6290
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5019 | 220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1185 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1185 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Mendocino | Cedar |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 4 December 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1644 | 1645 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | 400 MHz |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 30.40 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 486.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 80 |
Pixel fill rate | 7.600 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | |
Transistor count | 292 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |