AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) and NVIDIA NVS 3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 606 MHz
- 3134x more texture fill rate: 15.20 GTexel/s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5090 vs 2905
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 606 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 16 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 vs 2905 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 3100M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | NVIDIA NVS 3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 | 2905 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 118 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 34 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 578 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 578 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 988 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | NVIDIA NVS 3100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Mendocino | GT218 |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 7 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1643 | 1646 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
| Compute units | 2 | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 606 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 30.40 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 486.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 128 | 16 |
| Pixel fill rate | 7.600 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 12.64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |