AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
• 8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 807

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60872 vs 27872
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12906 vs 7029
• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6273 vs 2799

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	27872 60872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	876 807
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7029 12906
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2799 6273

Compare specifications (specs)