AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs AMD Radeon 780M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6550M and AMD Radeon 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6550M
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 181.8 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9629 vs 7059
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45053 vs 27847
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9629 vs 7059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45053 vs 27847 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 2840 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 872 vs 477
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 2840 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 872 vs 477 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6550M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 780M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6550M | AMD Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | 872 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9629 | 7059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45053 | 27847 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6550M | AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 24 | Phoenix |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 4 Jan 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 207 | 204 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz | 2900 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | 12 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.88 GPixel/s | 92.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s | 139.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | System Dependent |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | System Shared |
Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |